if you support the motion:
I The linking of employment and degrees has placed undue demand on Indian universities.
Almost every school-age youngster enrolls in a university later in life, without regard for his inherent talent and interest.
(ii) Educational standards degrade as a result of the admissions rat race to university educational institutions.
Students pursue courses not for higher education, but to join a job market that demands a degree.
(iii) In many circumstances, there is no relationship between the nature of a work and the education obtained since the skills necessary for the job are never taught throughout university degree courses.
(iv) Almost all sectors are needed to train new hires, rendering years of university study obsolete.
As a result, time and money invested on obtaining a degree are squandered.
(v) India is an impoverished nation that cannot afford to squander its resources.
On average, the government spends little more than Rs.1000/- per student every year throughout the degree course, and quite frequently, even after obtaining a post-graduate degree, a student ends up working as a teller at a bank, counting from 1 to 99 for the rest of his life.
If you oppose the motion, you must do the following:
I If the minimal degree criterion is not met, there will be a massive rush in the labor market.
(ii) In the graduating process, below-average students are immediately filtered out, allowing average and above-average students to be easily recognized.
(iii) Degrees give stability in decision-making since maturity and effectiveness are only achievable after putting in enough time to pursue an academic career.
(iv) A person's whole growth can take place only in an environment of university norms, not when just specialized instruction is provided to a candidate, depriving him of the opportunity to develop his personality.
(v) Rationality and analytical thinking can only be learned via dedicated study, which are only achievable in a university setting.